The BBC published an article about current DNA technology that was really interesting.
The article looked at the cost of sequencing the entire Human Genome and the information we can get from it. It touched upon what we still have to learn from sequencing the human genome.
I thought it was interesting that Professor Church addressed the point that understanding DNA does not mean we will soon live to be 150 years old. There seems to be a functional expectation that any and all science must first, and foremost, advance the quality of life for mankind.
When will people value knowledge for the sake of being enlightened to the natural world that we live in? It's not about what we get out of it in terms of improved health and profitable ventures, it's as significant to pursue the knowledge for the sake of understanding the world (though I am sure many fiscal conservatives would disagree).
I suppose it is difficult to argue that in an atmosphere of tightening budgets that science should pursue the knowledge of nature and the universe with a vigor without the expectation of some form of return on the investment... But I digress.
In any case, enjoy the article!
Search the Blog
Monday, September 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment